On the topic of Cho Seung-Hui and the shooting at Virginia Tech Uni, I have something to say...
After the incident made headlines on today's newpapers once again, a few of my friends, classmates, schoolmates etc texted/MSN me about some parellels they drew between the killer and a friend of ours.
1) He stalks girls, even though he would vehemently deny it, most girls complain about being stalked/harrassed by him
2) He blames the whole world for everything that goes wrong with in his life.
[ie. Me against the "_____"]
3) He thinks he's holier than thou
4) He cannot see past superficial reasons for others' popularity
5) He is a loner
6) He is a loser
The only difference is we do not know whether he has been admitted to a mental hospital, and whether or not he has guns.
Oh btw, I used the word 'friend' because the newspaper mentioned that Cho was a loner and had no friends. Hence to avoid such tragedy from happening, I shall hereby create an illusion that he does have friends.
PS: Hong Myong Bo, you dont have to pretend to be a Korean to make reference to another Korean, yar? I have your IP address, and it looks very familiar...ermm why har?
About Me
- Isabelle, Singapore
- A 24-years-young cosmopolitan Professional by day; a dreamer, escapist and hedonist at heart who is born to party and forced to work. A beauty junkie, clubaholic, fashion snob, foodie, who dreams of owning a yacht to sail the seven seas. To contact me, please email themaocow@gmail.com
I heart SOPHISTICATE
White tailored dress on Isabelle from Sophisticate @ 51 Telok Ayer Street #01-05 Singapore
Straits Times Urban
Loves HadaLabo Super Hyaluronic Acid
PA's Passion Card
Spot me?
10 comments:
OMG i realized I posted almost the exact same thing as ZY did uner my comments for the previous post... Hurhurhur
This message is meant for you. You are a blooming hypocrite. You disgust me with your allusions to the Virginia Tech massacre, particularly in the way that you make unjust comparisons to this silly dispute you ostensibly have going on with this guy that you alleged to have just added you on the an alternative MSN account. First, I don't even think that comparison is remotely funny nor anything of that sort, and as a nickname, diminishes the impact that he has had on our lives as a whole since his espousal of fighting a religious war. But that is another debate for another time.
Anyway, I have called you a hypocrite for the behaviour you have demonstrated here. Do not go about the next making unjust comparisons between a serial killer who has single-handedly gunned down at least 33 individuals and that of one of your peers, just out of spite for the latter. I don't know whether the grievances you bear towards this person are valid or not, but in sight of what Cho Seung-Hui has done, you're being tremendously disrespectful towards those that have passed on in Virginia. You are a terrible person for that, and granted, person is the best noun that I'm willing to extend as a descriptor for you, for in your scurrilous ramblings, you have revealed yourself to be less than worthy of even being termed as such.
You should channel those supplications inwards, and think about what you are doing. If nothing else, do the dead justice, and show them some respect and leave them out of this childish sandlot squabble between you and whoever is involved.
Thanks
Write the same thing in http://kohchinaun.livejournal.com
Go ahead, copy and paste there.
He wrote the same thing.
Stop pretending to be somebody who's sympathetic to the Virginia Shooting, when you are just another nickname that somebody is using to cover for his ball-less self.
In addition, go look all over my blog, I have never used huhuhu's real name in relation to the guy who has previously added me on my MSN (ie johnson Tan). Huhuhu himself was the person who was digging his own grave.
If you want to talk about me defaming Johnson Tan, well, face it, there is no such person in the psychology department. I've checked. Neither is there a Liu Bo Ren in the Chinese department. So you can't defame a person who's doesn't exist right?
What I can safely conclude is that there is however a crazy nutcase in my department who pretends to be many people.
See, I still haven't named you.
As for hanging you by the belt using hooks, awww man, you really can't read. I said:
IF YOU WANNA THINK THAT I AM TALKING ABOUT YOU, THE 2nd PERSON BEARS MORE SEMBLANCE TO YOU THAN THE FIRST.
Plus I can't hang myself by that method because I said "hang by your chest high belt" I dont wear chest high belt you see.
THE SKIRTCHASER WASN'T CALLING YOU.
THE HOOKS WASN'T MEANT FOR YOU. (but if u wanna try them, you can buy them from Kmart yourself)
Neither was the person who kept calling herself NICE, you.
Oh and dont worry, I'll not delete your comments, or screen it like you do on your blog. I'm going to show the world just about how sick u are.
I just realised something funny. This might be out of context, but his comparisons to xy as Osama shouldn't be acceptable given what quek says.
The final death toll on the 9/11 incident was 2,752. Cho has a final death toll of 33 (including himself). I think it's worse when he compares her to Osama. He was being insensitive towards 2,752 victims whilst she was insensitive towards 32. (I left out Cho himself for obvious reasons) Quite funny right?
Also, checkout the explanation for xy's posting of comparisons on the first page. It may answer some of quek's obviously valid remarks.
However there are some remarks of queks that aren't that valid.
- Cho's not a serial killer (go google it)
- He's a killer, and apparently due to circumstances which were the subject of our discussion
If you can only identify him as a killer (or focus on that for the matter), your concept may be a tad too shallow as you don't consider why he became a killer. It's because of those considerations this post was made.
Kill people = killer. So cannot identify peer with him as peer has never killed. Genius at work here.
One last thing to consider. Is it considered disrespectful when we compare any terrorist attack to 9/11? Is it disrespectful when in law we use the Bolam test? (i.e. using the name Bolam la) So unfortunately Cho is the new benchmark for such loner - stalking - weird thinking individual - turned violent killer examples. To put it simply la. Same as how stupid people are referred to as Bush. Heh.
Except it might be too early making use of the term at the moment and i agree it may then be construed to some as being disrespectful and insensitive.
Oh ya...and why am I a hypocrite ah?? Explain lei. You ramble on and on about me being a hypocrite, but none of your explanations point towards hypocritical behavior.
Hi, this is just a clarification. The text that is supposedly written by the character "quek" (otherwise known as KCA) was actually written by my friend. She wrote this comment, with the intention of posting it in the comments section of KCA's blog. However, upon submission, not only did KCA not approve the comment, but he simply copied and pasted the whole thing on your blog. I suppose this is little cause for wonder, considering he probably has problems stringing together original sentences without copying left and right.
Ah, I forgot to add that he pasted it verbatim.
Or rather, almost verbatim. Now it's another friend who knows of the original comment. Incidentally, an earlier comment saying that "This might be out of context, but his comparisons to xy as Osama shouldn't be acceptable given what quek says" is particularly insightful indeed, since that was the purpose of the original comment targeted at Mr I-have-no-balls-nor-brains-so- I-use-the words-of-others and his rantings on Osama and Cho. Which is also why the charges of hypocrisy don't make sense, since he was obviously pissed off at that stupid SOB for sending condolences and whatever and then saying such crap.
I know you're reading this now KCA, and you know what, now that we all know more about your faking stuff, there's really nothing left to hide. But hey, if you want to keep proclaiming your innocence, go ahead. Let the flame wars begin.
Really very drama sia. I didn't know he was so desperate until like that. Imagine if we get everyone together, roundtable discussion. I wonder how he will feel when all his rubbish gets torn apart by everyone there. Then again I won't be surprised if he wouldn't turn up to such an invitation. Choosing instead to hide behind a barrage of fake names and hang out with his imaginary friends. Heck. Invite them too. This should be fun. I'll bring the beer. Imaginary friends don't drink alot right? I have 2 cans in my fridge now, should be enough. Hahaha. One for Johnson Tan and one for Liu Boren since we've established that Quek is non-existant/him. Make sure they bring their matric cards. One is psychology and one is chinese something right? I don't recall there being a chinese fac so i suppose it's arts ba.
This is not a flame war okay. this is an invitation to drink and chat. see. we're being sociable.
Xiaoyun, while i barely know you, and Chin Aun, i must say that your name has been pretty well-known in NUS for the wrong reasons. Perhaps accusing others of stalking and personal attacks aside, you should come to re-evaluate your own approach towards interpersonal relations. I have spoken to two completely unrelated groups of friends, and both groups talked about you with the most passion for all the wrong reasons.
I'm not zooming into you. Im saying that besides allegedly Chin Aun, friends who are more close and direct to me relate the same experiences about you. While you would want to clarify on your own blog with your... friends... i suggest this is one instance where you should also think about yourself. Accusing others of doing things that they did not know is not the way to make new friends. But its up to you - your life.
I'll leave it for you to reflect.
Post a Comment